View Single Post
Old January 5th, 2008, 12:31 PM   #17
andysmz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 104
Thanks: 12
Thanked 783 Times in 98 Posts
andysmz 2500+andysmz 2500+andysmz 2500+andysmz 2500+andysmz 2500+andysmz 2500+andysmz 2500+andysmz 2500+andysmz 2500+andysmz 2500+andysmz 2500+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerkwad View Post
This must have been a legal grey area in the mid -70's, but for a time it was possible to buy magazines in your average High Street newsagent depicting uncensored insertion of objects into the vagina .........
It was indeed a legal grey area and anyone who has access to a range of Sullivan's mags from the 70s (hattertim perhaps ?) should be able to confirm that the censorship varied from issue to issue with some clearly showing vibrators, vegetables etc inserted and then a couple of issues down the line a similar scene would be censored. I think Sullivan's approach was fairly cynically to maximize profits and was essentially taking a big risk with odd issues to see if they were seized from the newsagents (who had them on sale or return) and if they weren't the punters would be sure to buy the next issue expecting the same but actually get fairly mild stuff until the next time he decided to put out a stronger issue. Similarly the local porn squads were kept guessing as unless they did "test purchases" every month, they would never be certain whether a given title was likely to be obscene or not.
andysmz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to andysmz For This Useful Post: