|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
Vintage Erotica Talk Talk about vintage erotica right here! |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
December 31st, 2010, 06:42 PM | #11 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest USA
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 14,084
Thanked 152,438 Times in 2,928 Posts
|
TOTAL PACKAGE
I enjoy the "work" he did before about 1991-2 when he morphed into nothing more than a robotic semen delivery system, driven in total by money.
Before that point in his career: A great physical specimen; hung like a horse; unrivalled cumshot volume; always appeared to have fun doing the partner; showed a respect for those partners; projected a cleancut image; no tats, rings, or long, shaggy hair; shunned "extreme" sex; gave impression of reality in sex scenes. He represents a lot of what I'm not and I can vicariously participate in his adventures. In the tangled darkness of for-profit porn, lying below below the surface he represented, to me through his acting, a lighter, more believeable and realistic essence of sex. It's all an act, but he was a DeNiro, Hanks or Pacino. |
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to thecossack For This Useful Post: |
December 31st, 2010, 06:42 PM | #12 |
Gusset Man & Jizzmaster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Wanking, but not the city in China
Posts: 2,043
Thanks: 5,203
Thanked 34,738 Times in 2,027 Posts
|
I'd say it's pretty self-explanatory. Part of watching b/g porn is putting yourself in the position of the guy - it's not some random cock slamming in and out of that hot chick's mouth/pussy/arse, it's yours. OK, this fails dismally in watching anything with Ron Jeremy in it or where there's too much time spent focussing on the guy's gurning face, but I digress.
The big thing about Peter North - apart from his cock - is his ability to produce loads that more often than not give his target a thorough coating. I always thought I could shoot plenty until I saw his unleash some monster blasts - and that's part of the mystique I guess. In short, (a) he gets to fuck and cum-shower some of the hottest chicks in the business; (b) he can on occasion shoot up to a dozen individual decent spurts which is in anyone's book pretty amazing - we are not talking about spurt, spurt, dribble here.
__________________
"Birth Control Tip #2431: Shoot your load in a girl's mouth or on her face instead of inside her sweet bits. Result: no expensive burden, stretch marks or saggy tits". To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Sharkhunter For This Useful Post: |
January 1st, 2011, 12:24 AM | #13 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 790
Thanks: 983
Thanked 19,497 Times in 792 Posts
|
He's undoubtably the hardest working man in pornography and from all reports a real nice dude. So it comes down to simple probability - since he has appeared in more films than anyone else, it follows that he would receive the most "press".
Just my thoughts. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to domac80 For This Useful Post: |
January 1st, 2011, 01:22 AM | #14 |
Former Staff
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Burren, Eireann
Posts: 4,364
Thanks: 23,645
Thanked 59,849 Times in 4,188 Posts
|
As Greenskull said, It doesn't really interest me. But there are certain iconic performers lets say like Tom Byron that are in the "six degrees of....ahem.....bacon" category that from an archivists perspective link up so many women together. You can often use these performers scene pairing info as virtually a who's who of particular eras of erotica.
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to burpman For This Useful Post: |
|
|